Words by Andrea Gomblová

Photography Conny Mirbach

Fräulein Talents: Ruscha Voormann and the Art of Letting Go

For Ruscha Voormann, painting is an act of negotiation. Between intuition and control, movement and stillness, certainty and doubt, her works emerge through a continuous process of adjustment rather than fixed intention. What interests her is not resolution, but the possibility of holding opposing forces in balance. Having moved from figurative painting into abstraction, Voormann has developed a practice that embraces ambiguity and transformation. Influenced by the visual languages of both the analog and digital age, her paintings resist linear narratives in favor of atmosphere, rhythm, and emotional states that remain deliberately open. Ahead of her upcoming projects, the artist reflects on creative insecurity, the influence of David Lynch, the role of mistakes, and why uncertainty has become one of her most trusted companions.

Andrea Gombalová: How did you find your own specific (aesthetic) expression, and how would you describe it today?

Ruscha Voormann: Born in 1992, I belong to a generation that grew up between analog and digital visual worlds and was profoundly shaped by their increasing intersection. 

This dual imprint forms the starting point of my practice: I work with a classical, physical medium, yet translate the visual logics of digital images into painterly processes.

Earlier in your practice, you worked between figurative and abstract painting, while now your work has become fully abstract. What shifted for you?

There were several triggers, but one important moment for me was the revival of Twin Peaks in 2016, when David Lynch announced the third season. For people born in the early 1990s, Twin Peaks was originally more of a myth than a series. Through the revival, many people of my generation watched it for the first time. 

 

What impressed me most was Lynch’s relationship to time. Perhaps precisely because he originally came from painting, he was able to let different temporalities and emotional states exist simultaneously within his films. He allowed contradictions and unanswered questions to remain unresolved and demanded that viewers endure this uncertainty.

 

From the moment I stopped trying to understand everything in the Twin Peaks series completely, I also began letting go of figurative narratives within my own work and moved more deeply into the timelessness of abstraction.

This process of letting go happened almost automatically and paradoxically gave me more stability than narrative clarity ever had before.

In what ways is your work connected to your personal development and life circumstances? How have changes in your life influenced your art?

Art and creativity were always present in my family environment. As a result, drawing and painting became a completely natural language through which I could express myself, and so they remained.

 

One major change in my life that strongly influenced my art was meeting my husband, the artist Milen Till, in 2019. Back then, I was working full-time at the advertising agency Meiré und Meiré in Cologne. Besides that, I always created small windows of time in which I could paint in my tiny apartment. 

 

What I was still missing was artistic exchange. When Milen entered my life, he filled exactly this gap. That was the moment things started moving again.

How much of being creative is also a struggle with yourself, your insecurities, and doubts about whether what you’re doing is good enough?

A huge part of it. Beyond financial pressure, the main reason why I only decided relatively late to study fine art was that

I was afraid of eventually ending up hating the very thing I loved most: painting. Today, I know that doubt is simply part of art and perhaps even its most important driving force.

Transformation seems to sit at the core of your work, not only visually, but emotionally and structurally. What continues to draw you to states of change and transition?

The realization that everything is constantly changing is probably the greatest comfort in my life.

An essential aspect of this is the relationship to mistakes. Only through the possibility of change do mistakes become bearable in the first place. A painting emerges through a permanent process of transition in which you are constantly trying to create balance and harmony. Through successful decisions, but also through mistakes.

 

Once you understand that mistakes do not need to disappear but can instead be integrated, an enormous sense of freedom opens up.

A technical drawing should be flawless; a work of art, in my opinion, should not.

You studied under Gregor Hildebrandt at the Academy of Fine Arts Munich. Could you tell us what you think that period gave you?

Being accepted into Gregor’s class fulfilled a lifelong dream for me. I finally found the right tools and the courage to encounter myself as an artist and confront what that term really meant for me.

 

Through the immense spaces of the Academy, I also realized how naturally comfortable and confident I felt working on a large scale. My diploma project, Aquarius, included a 3.70 Å~ 5 meter painting as well as two 2.40 Å~ 1.75 meter Plexiglas works. The response from the thousands of visitors during the diploma exhibition was incredible. I had the impression that the scale of the work created a kind of collective imagination in which we all participated.

Outside of painting, what kinds of things influence or inspire you the most lately?

Running. Overcoming personal, mostly imagined, limits and realizing how much can be achieved through patience and endurance is deeply inspiring to me.

What does a studio day look like for you when things are going well creatively?

When things are going particularly well creatively, an emerging pressure forces men to take a radical step that suddenly turns everything upside down.  A disturbing emptiness fills the room, and I feel like a complete beginner again.

 

For example, I am currently working on two paintings that carry a certain pressure. At the end of June, they will be shown in the group exhibition Empty Places, Crowded Hearts at Galerie Crone in Berlin alongside works by fantastic female artists such as Rosemarie Trockel, Hanne Darboven, Channa Horwitz, Charlotte Posenenske and Carola Dertnig.

 

Being able to exhibit alongside these artists, who have long been role models for me, fills me with a sense of respect that is incredibly motivating, but not always easy to navigate.

 

In moments like these, I transform my studio into a place of protection, almost like a cave in complete darkness.

Through painting, I create a light that gradually becomes brighter until I can see clearly again and the pressure disappears. This is how I find my way to the next level.

How do you protect your creativity from the pressure of outside noise and what kind of energy do you try to surround yourself with in your everyday life?

Daily routines and avoiding alcohol and other drugs are my greatest forms of protection. In that way, my body can provide me every morning with the energy I need for the day ahead. It is therefore less about surrounding myself with a certain external energy and more about creating an inner state from which concentrated and open action becomes possible.

What are the moments where you feel most like yourself?

When I’m asleep. During sleep, you process so much that there is no way to be anything other than yourself.